models / compare / inkling-vs-qwen3-5
Inkling vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
How Inkling (Thinking Machines Lab, July 2026) and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (Alibaba Qwen, February 2026) are built, drawn on the same November 2026 blueprint. They make different choices on 8 of 27 components. Select a component in either diagram to find it in the table.
--- frontier-llm@2026-11+++ inkling@2026-07+0~5−3
Inkling
Thinking Machines Lab, July 2026, 975B total, 41B active
--- frontier-llm@2026-11+++ qwen3-5@2026-02+0~3−3
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Alibaba Qwen, February 2026, 397B total, 17B active
Component by component
Inkling and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B differ on 8 of 27 components.
| Blueprint component | Inkling | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
Single pre-norm residual streamOne d = 6,144 residual stream through 66 pre-norm blocks; no hyper-connections, branch outputs pass a short conv. | Single residual streamOne d = 4,096 pre-norm residual stream with zero-centred RMSNorm gains; no hyper-connections or depth attention. | |
Learned relative-position bias (no RoPE)Each head adds a bias by backward distance: a query-dependent mix of 16 learned profiles, over 512 (local) or 1,024 (global) tokens. | Same as the blueprintPartial, interleaved multimodal RoPE (M-RoPE) in the attention layers only: 64 of 256 head dims rotate (partial_rotary_factor 0.25), θ = 10,000,000, with the 32 frequency pairs split 11/11/10 between time, height and width. The Gated DeltaNet layers carry no explicit position. | |
Same as the blueprintGated DeltaNet in 45 of 60 layers, three before every attention layer. 16 query/key heads and 64 value heads of dim 128 (each q/k head serves 4 value heads); short causal conv (kernel 4) + SiLU on q, k, v; per-head scalar decay g = −eᴬ·softplus(a + dt_bias) and write strength β = σ(b). Each layer keeps a 64 × 128 × 128 state per sequence, held in FP32. | ||
Global GQA with log-length scaling11 full-attention layers (every 6th, incl. the last): 64 Q / 8 KV heads, d_h = 128; logits scaled up logarithmically past 128K. | Gated grouped-query attentionEvery fourth layer: full causal GQA with 32 query heads sharing 2 KV heads of dim 256, QK-Norm and a sigmoid output gate. | |
Same as the blueprint55 of 66 layers (all except 5, 11, …, 65) attend to the last 512 tokens with 64 query heads and 16 KV heads of dimension 128. Keys and values pass through a kernel-4 causal convolution before caching, and the relative-position bias spans the whole window. | ||
Short causal convolutions (SConv)Depthwise causal convs (kernel 4, with skip) on K, V and on both sublayer outputs before they rejoin the residual. | Same as the blueprintIn the attention layers q_proj emits 2 × 32 × 256 values per token; the second half is an elementwise sigmoid gate, computed from the layer input, applied to the attention output before W_o. Gated DeltaNet layers gate their output with SiLU(z) after a per-head RMSNorm. No sink logits. | |
Sigmoid router with shared-expert sinkScores 256 routed + 2 shared experts; bias-steered top-6; weights normalized jointly over the 8 active experts, then ×8. | Softmax top-k routerA linear router scores 512 experts; softmax, keep the top 10, renormalize. No selection bias. | |
Same as the blueprintMuon for large matrix weights and Adam for all other parameters, with weight decay coupled to the square of the learning rate. Hyperparameter schedules draw on Thinking Machines' modular-manifolds research. Newton–Schulz settings are not published. |